While physical injury
cases can be decided without digging deeper into scientific details,
toxic tort cases require a somewhat more complex approach to come up
with a fair judgment. Namely, it requires the statement of a reliable
medical expert witness. Here are some basic facts about the technical
realm of toxic tort claims and litigation that every lawyer should
arm themselves with:
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Forensic Toxicology: The Need for Expert Witnesses
Dealing
with mysterious criminal cases requires forensic
science
to obtain fact-based evidence. All evidence has to be carefully
examined by a forensic toxicologist, a professional who has vast
knowledge of chemicals and their effects on physical matter. A
forensic toxicologist in this scenario becomes an expert witness and
his opinion can serve either the defense or the prosecution.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Toxic Tort Challenges: Why You Need Expert Witness
Toxic
torts are lawsuits filed by or for individuals who were exposed to
toxic substances, resulting in injuries, sicknesses, or other
damages. For toxic tort to succeed, three things have to be proven:
first, that a substance involved is toxic; second, that the plaintiff
was exposed to it; and third, that the exposure to the substance
indeed caused harm to the plaintiff. Unfortunately, proving these
three things is easier said than done.
This
is mainly because of two major challenges confronting plaintiffs:
causation and latency periods. In many cases the testimony of a
toxicology expert witness is needed to overcome these challenges.
Causation
is self-explanatory. While toxic chemicals can indeed cause injury
and sickness, other “non-toxic” factors may also lead to the same
result. For example, it can be difficult to prove that a certain
substance is directly responsible for causing cancer in someone,
since the disease itself can be caused by heredity. Determining
causation also extends to the parties involved in the incident. For
instance, exposure to toxic chemicals at the workplace can be blamed
on the supervisors, the chemicals’ manufacturers and distributors,
and other similar groups or individuals.
The
latency period, or the amount of time between exposure and the onset
of injuries or sickness, can also stop a toxic tort dead in its
tracks. Certain chemicals, for example, are known to cause cancer
after 40 years. Defendants can argue that the plaintiff have
contracted the disease from other sources that the plaintiff may also
have been exposed to.
Thursday, September 4, 2014
The Different Forms of Misdiagnosis
Did
you know that as much as 1 in 20 patients in outpatient clinics or
doctor’s offices are misdiagnosed every year? That’s according to
a recent study published in the BMJ Quality & Safety journal.
This figure does not include similar cases that may have happened in
hospital settings.
Misdiagnosis
can come in several forms, including those discussed below.
Doing
too little
In
some instances, the diagnosis completely misses the patient’s
condition, or passes off a serious illness or injury as non-serious.
For instance, stomach pains that are treated simply as constipation
could later be found to be a case of internal bleeding or a cancerous
growth. Improper diagnosis or treatment can be construed as
negligence on the part of the doctor.
Doing
too much
Conversely,
the doctor may diagnose a patient with a serious condition. A mass
detected in radiographic images and treated with cancer-fighting
drugs may turn out on further examination to be benign. Excessive or
unnecessary treatment which stems from erroneous medical judgments or
aggressive treatment approaches can also constitute negligence.
These
two main types of misdiagnosis can result to serious harm or even
death, which could be grounds for a medical malpractice suit. In
proving that negligence had indeed transpired, the testimony of an
internal medicine or forensic toxicology expert can be helpful. Such
a professional can identify deviant treatments, poisoning drugs, and
other possible harmful factors that can arise from medical
negligence.
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Discerning the Facts of a Legal Case
All case-winning legal
arguments have one thing in common: they are transparent and informed
presentations of facts that best explain the circumstances of the
crime or civil issue brought before the court. However, on occasion,
it may be difficult for laypersons to decipher the meaning and
significance of each piece of evidence presented before a judge. In
such cases, the skills of an
expert witness
might be necessary.
Friday, August 1, 2014
Figuring out Alcohol Poisoning
Once in a while, it’s
good to have a drink with your friends; you bond and talk with them
over a few shots, and simply enjoy each other’s company. However,
time does fly when you’re having fun and it’s possible that you
would have downed several shots more than you think you had. Such
instances can result into alcohol poisoning, and if something bad
does happen, a forensic toxicology specialist will help uncover the
truth.
Thursday, July 17, 2014
Kinds of Witnesses: A Focus on Expert Witnesses
All kinds of
legal proceedings require a witness’s account to tie up all details and make
sense of documents that have been gathered through a subpoena to compile
evidences. There are times, however, when the narration of an ordinary witness,
or even the impeachment of a hostile witness, is not enough to make judges and
jurors understand certain facts and issues that involve highly technical or
specialized forms of knowledge. This is where expert witnesses come in.
An expert
witness can be any professional who is regarded as a respected member in their
field. Expert witnesses are more commonly called in for cases involving, but
are not limited to, personal injury or criminal cases wherein their testimonies
are deemed to be vital in shedding light on matters involving medical science,
toxicology, and other related specializations.
There are some
things that distinguish an expert witness from the other types of witnesses.
Expert witnesses are not necessarily related to any party in the cases where
they are giving their testimony. Another distinction is that they are the only
kind of witnesses allowed by the general rules of court to give opinion and
draw conclusions as long as it is related to their field of expertise. Their
objectivity and specialized knowledge make them vital in winning a case for or
against plaintiffs in a personal injury lawsuit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)